1378: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) | Skeptical Sunday

1378: Female Genital Mutilation (FGM) | Skeptical Sunday

This transcript is yet untouched by human hands. Please proceed with caution as we sort through what the robots have given us. We appreciate your patience!

Jordan Harbinger: [00:00:00] Welcome to Skeptical Sunday. I'm your host, Jordan Harbinger. Today I'm here with Skeptical Sunday co-host writer and researcher Jessica Wynn. On The Jordan Harbinger Show, we decode the stories, secrets, and skills of the world's most fascinating people and turn their wisdom into practical advice that you can use to impact your own life and those around you.

Our mission is to help you become a better informed, more critical thinker. During the week, we have long form conversations with a variety of amazing folks from spies to CEOs, athletes, authors, thinkers, and performers. On Sundays though, we do Skeptical Sunday, a rotating guest co-host, and I will break down a topic you may have never thought about and debunk common misconceptions about that topic such as why tipping makes no sense, astrology, recycling, internet porn, GMOs, toothpaste, and more.

If you're new to the show or you want to tell your friends about the show, I suggest our episode starter packs. These are some of our favorite episodes on persuasion, negotiation, psychology, disinformation, junk science, crime and cults, and more. That'll help new listeners get a taste of everything we do here on the show.

Just visit [00:01:00] jordanharbinger.com/start or search for us in your Spotify app to get started. Before we jump in today, I need to give a real warning here. What we are covering in this episode is brutal, not edgy, not merely provocative, but actually just brutal and horrifying. We're going to discuss the deliberate cutting of female genitals, a practice that is happening somewhere in this world as you listen to this episode right now.

And if this one isn't for you, I completely understand, but I hope that you'll stay with us because this practice survives partly because most of us would rather just not even think about it. So we're all just going to be uncomfortable together, I think, on this one. Now today we're examining the myths, justifications, and power structures that have allowed female genital mutilation or FGM to persist for centuries.

Many of us don't know exactly what it is, why it's done, or who advocates for this procedure in the first place. Here to make us squirm in our seats is writer and researcher Jessica Wynne. Jess, thanks for being here for what I confess is already kind of a horror movie of an episode, and I haven't even asked a question yet.

Jessica Wynn: I mean, this [00:02:00] is unpleasant for sure, but I actually think that discomfort is useful. Most people look away from FGM because it's almost unbearable to think about. The problem is when everybody looks away, silence stops being accidental. It becomes part of the machinery that keeps the practice going.

Jordan Harbinger: What do you mean?

Jessica Wynn: Well, survivors are often expected not to talk about it. Families who are involved don't talk about it. Governments underfund efforts to stop it. Even journalists and researchers sometimes struggle to cover it without turning entire cultures into caricatures. And the rest of us just file it away as something awful happening somewhere else.

When everybody has a reason not to look too closely, that collective silence doesn't just surround FGM, it protects it. And that's why we're talking about it. And we're not talking about a few isolated cases here. We're talking hundreds of millions [00:03:00] of women and girls.

Jordan Harbinger: Damn. Okay. So okay, before we go any further here, I know some people will compare this to male circumcision, and I'm not saying circumcision and FGM are the same thing, but I think it highlights the bigger question of who decides what counts as an acceptable cultural practice involving a child's body?

And, and again, to be clear, these are not the same thing.

Jessica Wynn: Sure. But the comparison, it's worth holding onto, not because it's the same thing, it definitely isn't, but because it forces us to consider both practices. But I want to underline the difference immediately. So male circumcision, it may be unnecessary and it raises real consent questions, but it's not the same as removing a girl's clitoris, narrowing a vaginal opening, or cutting healthy genital tissue from a child outside medical necessity.

Jordan Harbinger: I think part of why people struggle with this is they hear female circumcision and they imagine the female version of removing a foreskin, and they [00:04:00] think like, oh, they trim something and it hurts, and that's- it's just fine after that, and it's a medical thing.

Jessica Wynn: Anatomically, that's just not what's happening.

Jordan Harbinger: So I, I think a better analogy here is imagine if it was decided medically, or culturally I should say, that you only needed a one-inch penis, right? Like, okay, if you have one, one-and-a-half inch penis, that's all you need to reproduce. We don't want people enjoying sex. We don't want people masturbating or whatever.

And so they were just like, "Oh, you unfortunately have a seven-inch. We're going to have to cut this thing down, and what we're going to do is trick you into it or do it when you're a kid, when you have no choice." And that's kind of what we're talking about. That's a more apt analogy, I think, than comparing it to circumcision.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, that's so gross, John .

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, it's very gross. That by design though. That's, that's the point. Otherwise guys are like- Right, of course ... oh, they're just trimming some part of your labia. Like, uh, it sounds bad, but it's not that bad.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, it's really hard, especially for men to imagine, because there's just no real comparison.

It's not about equivalence, it's about the [00:05:00] normalization of it.

Jordan Harbinger: Every society has practices that may feel so normal that people just stop questioning them, and that, that does not make those practices harmless. Even the name is controversial. Female genital mutilation, female circumcision, genital cutting.

The word choice here matters too, and I'm going to guess that the cultures that do it don't call it FGM.

Jessica Wynn: Correct. Yeah. But all of those terms are squirmy. But mutilation is the term preferred by the human rights organizations whose data I've drawn from. I also think it best reflects the severity of what's actually happening. So some find the term mutilation is an external judgment that shuts down the conversation.

But we should sit with the tension of that vocabulary.

Jordan Harbinger: Sure. Well, for now let's start with the most basic question. What are we actually talking about? Because we said, "Oh, it's not the same thing and it's so bad," but what is female genital mutilation?

Jessica Wynn: Let's just go FGM- Yeah, right ... from here out, because it's -

Jordan Harbinger: It's a little cumbersome

Jessica Wynn: it's even uncomfortable to say. Yeah.

Jordan Harbinger: Yes.

Jessica Wynn: But it refers to a variety of [00:06:00] procedures involving the partial or total removal of the female external genitalia or other injury to the female genital organs for nonmedical reasons. And that's the official definition used by the World Health Organization and the United Nations.

And as you mentioned, it's also referred to as female circumcision or female genital cutting, just depending on context and who's speaking.

Jordan Harbinger: So this isn't one single procedure. There's different kinds of cutting?

Jessica Wynn: The World Health Organization classifies FGM into four types. So type one is called a clitoridectomy.

That's the partial or sometimes total removal of the clitoris, and potentially the hood of skin surrounding it. Then type two is called excision, and that involves removal of the clitoris and the labia minora, which are, you know, the inner lips of the vulva, sometimes also including the labia majora. Then type three is [00:07:00] called infibulation, and it's the most severe.

So it involves cutting and repositioning the labia to create a seal deliberately narrowing the vaginal opening. And type four is like a catchall for any other harmful procedures to the female genitalia for nonmedical purposes, things like pricking, piercing, scraping, burning happens. All of it's done to healthy, functional tissue with no medical reason.

Jordan Harbinger: My gag reflex is kicking in on this. Yeah,

Jessica Wynn: it's rough.

Jordan Harbinger: That is all horrifying. Do we even need to categorize them from least to most se-... Like, what's, wh- I'm surprised they have types. Is there a reason for that, I guess? Is that what's going on here?

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. They just exist to help researchers and policymakers understand the different forms of FGM and the harms associated with each.

So it's not like a hierarchy in which some forms are acceptable.

Jordan Harbinger: Okay.

Jessica Wynn: Every type is usually performed on a child who cannot consent. Every type [00:08:00] can cause severe pain, bleeding, infection, urinary and menstrual problems, and just lifelong complications. So since some or all of the labia is removed or the vaginal opening is deliberately narrowed, it creates serious risks during sex but, but again menstruation and childbirth. \

Jordan Harbinger: nOh yeah sure I didn't

Jessica Wynn: think about that. \nThere's just no mild version of genital mutilation. \

Jordan Harbinger: nYeah, I guess that was my objection as I was like whoa. It's almost like you're saying w- uh I, I didn't-- I don't mean to put words in your mouth. But it was almost like these are all so bad why is there a pyramid or whatever?

But it's not a pyramid. It's just a different categorization I see. So how does anyone function normally after having the labia removed with a vaginal opening sewn nearly shut. How do you recover from that? I mean that stuff is all there for a reason. And it's set up the way that it's set up for a reason. \

Jessica Wynn: nI mean many survivors don't recover. You know depending on the type they may live with chronic pain difficulty [00:09:00] urinating menstruating. Again there's painful sex. There can be recurrent infections. You know childbirth is just complicated and dangerous. \

nThat

Jordan Harbinger: you mentioned and I was like oh yeah if you y...

That i-it's already got to dilate from whatever it is. To accommodate a baby and if you're like. Oh we're going to half size it for cultural reasons. We're not really evolved to give birth and deal with that effectively I would imagine. Uh s-this is really

Jessica Wynn: f- Yeah its gnarly. \

Jordan Harbinger: nGnarly. Yeah. And just to be clear who we're talking about you said this is done on children who cannot. So this is primarily done on literal children actual kids. \

Jessica Wynn: nCorrect. Yeah FGM is normally carried out between infancy and age fifteen. \

Jordan Harbinger: nOh God. \

Jessica Wynn: nYeah. Though older girls and women. They can be subjected to it. It's most often performed by traditional practitioners on really young girls. \

Jordan Harbinger: nWhen I hear traditional practitioner I'm thinking that means not a medical doctor. Right. We're not talking about. This is not happening in a hospital operating room with a [00:10:00] surgeon. \

Jessica Wynn: nUsually not. No. So. In many communities it has traditionally been performed. By self proclaimed circumcisers you know elders. Or other respected members of the community. Often with no formal medical training. And they're using razors, knives, scissors or yeah, whatever instruments are available.

And anesthesia? Really uncommon. \

Jordan Harbinger: nSure. Where would they even get it, and how would they put it into practice? That's a whole specialty of medicine.

Jessica Wynn: Right, which you know leads to... You know the sterile conditions are usually absent.

Jordan Harbinger: Ugh. God.

Jessica Wynn: There's been a disturbing development though within healthcare professionals who are increasingly performing it but that's a very recent change.

Either way, it infringes on the most fundamental human rights; the right to health, to security, to dignity, to bodily autonomy. And in [00:11:00] cases where the procedure leads to death, which it does, the right to life itself. You know that's why organizations around the world consider this a human rights issue.

Jordan Harbinger: Geez wow. Okay so the language really does matter here. Mutilation versus cutting versus circumcision. Those aren't interchangeable. So what's actually at stake in what we call it? Uh you know the human rights organization focus on mutilation, I agree with that, but why doesn't everybody just do that?

Jessica Wynn: Well you know the word you choose, it tells people what kind of conversation you're trying to have.

You know who's in the room here. Mutilation is the term used by most international human rights organizations because they want to make one thing unmistakably clear. This is a human rights violation involving a child's body. It's child abuse. It's not simply a cultural tradition people happen to disagree about.

And there's a strong argument for that framing because softening the language risks [00:12:00] softening the moral clarity of it all.

Jordan Harbinger: So why does it matter what we call it? Honestly I'm not losing sleep over offending anybody about this. If you're cutting little girls, I'm calling it mutilation by some Stone Age ass religious psycho or whatever.

There are just some traditions that deserve to be judged out of existence.

Jessica Wynn: Absolutely and you're in really good company thinking that. That's exactly why The World Health Organization, the UN, most human rights organizations use the word 'mutilation.' They want to make it just so clear that this isn't a cultural curiosity.

It's certainly not a medical procedure. There's no bones about it. It is a human rights violation. So the debate isn't whether the practice is horrific. It's about how to have the conversation about it that doesn't make. Practicing communities feel attacked. \

Jordan Harbinger: nSo now we're balancing two things; moral clarity and actually persuading people to stop this madness.

Jessica Wynn: Exactly. And human rights organizations [00:13:00] tend to prioritize moral clarity. Some community health workers prioritize persuasion because, you know, in some communities the word mutilation, it sounds like a personal accusation instead of an invitation to reconsider the practice. You know, tell parents here in America that male circumcision is mutilation and watch how quickly people stop listening.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. So it's funny because I'll admit it, this exact type of conversation did change my mind. I was b- when I was born in 1980, I was circumcised, I guess, uh, because everyone was probably- Right ... back then. It was just done. It was just

Jessica Wynn: done.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. And my mom was Jewish, but non-practicing. I don't think that played any role in it.

I think the doctor was just like, "All right, we're going to do this unless you have some weird objection." She was like, "I don't know, I'm loopy on fentanyl," or whatever they give you when you give birth. So d- do what you've got to do. My son is not circumcised. Sorry Jayden, I'm putting your business out there. But basically we did, I would say a lot of research, but even a couple of hours.

Like, the most cursory amount of research will show you that the procedure is quite [00:14:00] antiquated and mostly unnecessary if you don't have some other issues, and you live in the Western world, and you wash yourself, and stuff like that. So we just, we opted out of it. It just felt like there was no real medical reason for it here in the 21st century.

And if that changes, you can always get circumcised as a adolescent, or a teenager, or an adult, but you can't go the other way. There's no, uh, restoration. V- there's no reliable way to restore it. I know people try, but it's, you know, it's not quite the same.

Jessica Wynn: That's actually a perfect example. Nobody told your parents that they were monsters for circumcising you.

Jordan Harbinger: Right.

Jessica Wynn: But when presented with information you'd never really considered before, you know, when it came time to make that decision yourself, you made a different one. So there's another side to all this when the idea of circumcision surprises people too in other cultures.

Jordan Harbinger: Well yeah I- When I was an exchange student in Germany it was 1997, 1998 And they have coed saunas there which was really surprising.

I walked into the sauna a bunch of old la- ladies were there like oh my God [00:15:00] im sorry! Theyre Like what? Im like uh wait so i went out came back in then there was an old man. In there. So everybody is just mixed huh. Yeah youre American haha remember looking around. Everyone s naked. Remember exact moment cause I Was like. What Is wrong with everyone penis. You re 18 Whatever years old. Ive seen almost everything world why am I seeing something that. Just confusing havent what going on here. Then. Oh. Right. That S what foreskin looks like ive never. Seen one before. Never knew about. It told host brother. Circumcision thing crazy. Kind of. Looks you. Re Oddity we must look aliens. Too. Its weird. Had birthday party house. Talking how. Weird everyones circumsized. Not circum sized. Girls want see it. Ive[00:16:00]

never seen circumsized. Penis. Before. What. Brother. Dude. This your chance whip. Out. Living room. It s science its. Science. For science. One friends. Wait let me get you

Another beer. Definitely. Have do this wasnt girls. By way. Guys. Also curious. Maybe download email. From AOL If. Internet couldnt. Google. Looked. International porn. Everywhere. Could. See internet. Way before. You

Jessica Wynn: didnt worry. About people posting pics. Of. \nYour dickNo camera phones. Back. Nothing. No. One. Seen. Curiosity overwhelming no consequence. Other. People talking. Penis school. Pay publicity 90s. [00:17:00] Introduction. Whole. World. Dicks. Alien

Jordan Harbinger: Anteater. Trunks. To Me. \nRight. Happens. Other extreme. Where. Circumcision. Normal. America. Both know. Gentleman not. Circumsized

Jessica Wynn: Birth. Comedy bits. About it. Were not talking outta. Turn. But. When he was a teenager and he started seeing other guys in the locker room, he felt out of place because he wasn't circumcised and everybody else was. I mean, I just think it's so wild. He went to his parents as a teenager and was circumcised at 16.

I mean, it's astounding what we'll do to our bodies to fit in, you know?

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, I would imagine he regrets that as an adult or maybe doesn't care.

Jessica Wynn: He does and I will ... It does make him have a very unique penis I will say.. I've heard. I've heard.

Jordan Harbinger: Uh, [00:18:00] so I've heard yeah. Unlike the rest of this entire episode, the following ads are safe for work.

We'll be right back. This episode is sponsored in part by Dell and AMD. What if hackers stole your organization's encrypted data today? Not because they can read it now but because they're willing to wait until they can. That's the threat at the center of Episode 16 of The Cybersecurity Tapes. The story follows a pharmaceutical company preparing to release a potentially groundbreaking cancer treatment.

Attackers gain access through a third-party partner, copy the company's encrypted research archives, and hold onto them until quantum computing may give them the power to break the encryption. This strategy is known as harvest now decrypt later, and it changes how organizations need to think about sensitive information.

Data that appears secure today might not remain secure forever especially intellectual property, patient records, financial information or anything that could still be valuable years from now. The cybersecurity tapes brings complex threats to life by combining a fictional cyber thriller with practical insight from real experts.

You [00:19:00] experience the attack as it unfolds then learn what went wrong and how organizations can better prepare. Episode sixteen explores postquantum cryptography, third party risk, data classification, security hygiene, and the importance of beginning the transition before Q day arrives. Listen to episode sixteen of the Cyber Security Tapes because the data stolen today could become the breach your organization has to explain tomorrow.

This episode is also sponsored by Quince. I've got a closet full of clothes, but really only a small percentage of them ever make it into the regular rotation. They're the pieces that fit just right feel great don't require a lot of thought. That's what Quince does so well. They make timeless wardrobe staples from premium materials like organic cotton merino wool And one hundred percent Mongolian Kashmir their cashmere sweaters start at just sixty bucks which is an incredible price for something with the softness and quality you'd expect from a luxury brand.

The quince piece I probably wear most is their short sleeve European linen button up shirt. It's fancy! It's lightweight and breathable. But it still looks polished i can wear it on its own layer it over a t-shirt dress it up for dinner throw it on when I just want to look put [00:20:00] together Quints also makes premium pants fitted tees and polos and breathable activewear dependable basics designed to work across your wardrobe and hold up to everyday use. Everything at Quintz is priced fifty to eighty percent less than similar brands. They work directly with ethical factories and cut out the middlemen. So you're paying for great materials and craftsmanship not a giant logo or luxury markup. And Quince goes well beyond clothing with hotel quality bedding and bath products kitchen essentials and thoughtfully design furniture all made with the same focus on quality value and everyday living. \

Jen Harbinger: nFind your next fall favorites at Quince. Download the Quince app for app exclusive offers. Or go to quince dot com slash jordan. Get free shipping on your order and three sixty five day returns. Now available in Canada and the UK too. That's q u y n c e dot com slash Jordan. \

Jordan Harbinger: nDon't forget about our newsletter. Wee. Bit. Wiser. It's a two minute read every Wednesday almost. Highly practical and something that will change the course of your weekday or possibly even the whole month jordanh harbinger.com/news is where you can find it. Now back to Skeptical Sunday. [00:21:00] Okay, so with the female genital mutilation, back to the topic at hand here which is not the same thing as circumcision, how big of a problem are we actually talking about here?

What are the- what's the scale of this?

Jessica Wynn: I mean, the numbers are staggering. I was blown away, and the statistics are actually getting worse, not better. So the United Nations estimates 230 million girls and women alive today have undergone FGM. Wa-... Uh,

Jordan Harbinger: 230 million currently alive, not like throughout all of human history.

Jessica Wynn: Currently today.

Jordan Harbinger: I guess I just thought it was a tiny isolated practice in a handful of sub-Saharan African villages in Sudan or something. I th- I just thought this was much more niche.

Jessica Wynn: I mean, that's what most people think. Wow. That's what I thought before I dove into this for sure.

Jordan Harbinger: I thought you were going to say a few hundred thousand or like single digit millions, not 230 m-.

So 230 million, that's really hard to wrap your mind around. I mean, that's like close to the population of the [00:22:00] United States j- You know, it's... That's crazy to me.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, and that figure has increased by 15%. That's like 30 million more cases over the past eight years alone. So more than two million girls undergo FGM every single year often before their fifth birthday. Sometimes within just days of being born. \

Jordan Harbinger: nDays of being born.

has to be a dangerous procedure for a newborn. Come on. And by the way, the population of the US for those wondering is like 345 million. So 230 million women is more women that are in the United States have had, had this done. This is crazy to me. So days of being born, again, like that sounds super dangerous to me.

Jessica Wynn: It definitely is. And the reason the numbers keep climbing isn't because the rate is necessarily increasing everywhere. It's because th- the population in the places where FGM is most common are growing rapidly. Like Sub-Saharan Africa and parts of the Arab states, they're [00:23:00] experiencing, you know, the fastest population growth on Earth.

And by 2050, the number of girls born annually in those regions is projected to increase by over 60%. So even if the rate of FGM slowly falls, the number of girls affected can still go up. So in 2026, in this year, nearly four and a half million girls are at risk of undergoing FGM. More than half of them are under five years old.

Jordan Harbinger: And if the current trends hold...

Jessica Wynn: If things continue at the current pace, the numbers will rise and millions of girls will continue to be subjected to FGM. The global target is elimination by 2030, which that's approaching fast. So to meet that target, progress needs to accelerate 27 times faster than it's currently moving.

That's a whole generation of girls.

Jordan Harbinger: An entire generation. So FGM probably is not a [00:24:00] standalone practice. I have a feeling if a culture is doing this to girls, it's probably not the only terrible thing happening to these girls in their culture. Is that safe?

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. Unfortunately, yeah, you're right. One of the strongest connections is child marriage.

FGM and child marriage are often two parts of the same system. So the cutting is meant just to prepare the girl, and the, the marriage reinforces the social value of the cutting. So you really can't understand one without the other.

Jordan Harbinger: So it's not just about one cultural practice, it's about a whole infrastructure of beliefs about what girls and women are, are for?

Is FGM happening only in poor villages where people just don't know any better, and a little education might fix it? Is that the basic story here or what? I

Jessica Wynn: mean, that's the stereotype, right? But it's wrong in two important ways. So first, that thinking lets people in wealthy countries think, "Oh well, it's somebody else's problem."

And second, it [00:25:00] reduces a deeply complex practice down to ignorance. And that's not just inaccurate, it blinds us to what's actually keeping it alive. So Jaha Dukureh who is a UN Women Goodwill Ambassador and FGM survivor, she's spoken about this directly. She says there are still a lot of misconceptions about FGM, like it's practiced by ignorant Africans and people, you know, quote unquote, over there who are uneducated.

But she underwent FGM in Gambia when she was one week old. She spent her adult life fighting to end the practice everywhere.

Jordan Harbinger: Oof. Well, in fairness, there's a disconnect between Western culture and communities where FGM is practiced obviously, right?

Jessica Wynn: Well, not always. I mean, FGM is documented in 94 countries.

That's a lot. That's

Jordan Harbinger: a lot.

Jessica Wynn: It's most of the world.

Jordan Harbinger: Again, I thought you were going to say five. This is prevalent in five countri- But once you said 230 million, I was thinking, "Where the heck are they doing this?"

Jessica Wynn: [00:26:00] Yeah. It happens in parts of Asia, The Middle East, Europe. And the Americas. So for example, Mariam Safi, she was born in Texas.

She was cut at age seven on a family vacation to India. Her aunt apparently lured her into a basement clinic with the offer of a chocolate bar or something. I mean, she was seven years old. So she doesn't fit the picture most people carry around, and that's exactly why her story matters.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, that's super sad.

My son isn't even seven, so the idea of luring him into the basement and cutting his wiener off or something like that is, just makes me so angry.

Jessica Wynn: And he would remember that, for sure .

Jordan Harbinger: Of course, yeah. I'll never complain about family vacations again, that's for sure. So th- I can't believe this is a thing, the little, going on a little trip and snip.

It just seems like that's got to be illegal. It's certainly horrible.

Jessica Wynn: Oh God, trip and snip. That's-

Jordan Harbinger: Sorry ...

Jessica Wynn: that's, yeah I couldn't resist. It's actually sometimes called vacation cutting, [00:27:00] and this is a documented phenomenon where families living in Western countries like the US, the UK, Australia, Canada, France, wherever, they take their daughters away specifically to have FGM performed knowing it's illegal where they live.

And then the cutting happens in a jurisdiction where it may be legal or where enforcement is weak, and by the time the family returns, it's done. You know, Safi's story is just one of many, many vacation cutting stories.

Jordan Harbinger: Makes me so angry that they bring that stuff here, and then also, it's just, ugh, I hate this so much.

Okay. Is there a legal response to this? I feel like it's just got to be illegal to take your kid on a trip abroad, mutilate their genitals, and then come home like nothing happened and be like, "Well, you can't do anything, France, because we did this back in, I don't know, Somalia or whatever. So suck it."

Jessica Wynn: I mean, it's so muddy.

So some countries have extra territorial legislation, meaning their laws [00:28:00] technically apply to what their citizens do abroad. But prosecution is Extraordinarily difficult. So you need someone to report it first of all. If you do this to an infant or toddler they don- Right who's

Jordan Harbinger: going to report

Jessica Wynn: it? Yeah, they don't have the, the means to do that.

You need evidence across international jurisdictions. You need cooperation between legal systems that may have very different approaches to the practice. The UK has had laws against FGM since 1985 and didn't secure its first conviction until 2019 so that's one conviction in 34 years. I mean, that's not real enforcement.

Jordan Harbinger: No. Wow! So how are people escaping consequences? I guess you know lack of reporting and stuff but are there religious arguments for this? I think a lot of people assume this is like some kind of Islamic practice or something like that or- or l- I dunno.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, that's another one of the biggest misconceptions.

So FGM isn't an [00:29:00] Islamic practice. It actually predates Islam by centuries. It's also been practiced by some Christian communities and by communities with no particular religion at all. So the common thread isn't theology, it's culture. And in fact many Muslim religious leaders have been among the loudest voices condemning FGM In 2024, the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, or the OIC, which represents 57 Muslim majority countries, they formally condemned FGM and called on member states to eliminate it.

Jordan Harbinger: Wait, so the biggest organization representing Muslim majority countries is saying, "Hey guys, don't do this." That is very reassuring, and I hope that that message is effective.

Jessica Wynn: Absolutely. I mean, it's encouraging, but it's not the whole picture. So in 2024, for example, some influential religious leaders in Gambia publicly argued the exact opposite, issuing a religious opinion defending FGM and [00:30:00] supporting efforts to roll back the country's ban.

That's why this matters so much. You know, religious leaders can be among the most powerful forces for ending FGM or for keeping it alive.

Jordan Harbinger: So why does the religious justification persist?

Jessica Wynn: Well, because it's a useful mechanism of controlling a woman's body, right? Saying God requires this is a much more powerful enforcer than saying our tradition requires this.

It puts the practice beyond question, beyond the reach of ordinary social debate because, you know, if it's a divine mandate, opposition becomes dissent. But the good news is religious leaders are among the most effective allies in ending FGM precisely because of this dynamic. So when the framing is religious, the counter-framing also needs to be religious.

There's an imam in the village of Tangoy in Mali who has made it his mission to speak against [00:31:00] FGM every single Friday before prayer, and his community has completely abandoned the practice. Soe. Son the most trusted religious voice in a community says, "Hey, this is messed up- Yeah ... this is not what our faith requires," the ground shifts.

Jordan Harbinger: That is remarkable power used for good. It shows people change fastest when the message comes from somebody that they already trust, which makes sense.

Jessica Wynn: Absolutely.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. So do people also claim there are medical reasons for the practice as well? I mean, uh, that's kind of what it is with circumcision, right?

It's like, oh something something hygiene. And it ... When you talk to let's say religious Jews sometimes they'll just say, "Oh, it's in the book and so we do it." But other times it's like, "Oh, well it's more hygienic." And that was true for thousands of years but now it's like hey soap and water, it's go ahead and use some of that and you should be all right most of the time.

I

Jessica Wynn: know who was the first person to do th-... I mean it's just so bizarre.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. That's a good question.

Jessica Wynn: You know, like eh, this seems like a good idea.

Jordan Harbinger: It would have been a healer tens of thousands of years ago or g- I don't know even just maybe [00:32:00] 5,000 years ago I suppose. Uh, depends how old the practice is. I really don't know.

I assumed it was older than when it was written down by some years but m- I guess we can't ever know. But, uh, yeah they probably went, "Hey these things keep getting infected and whenever we peel it back it's pretty gross in there. What happens if we just cut this thing off?" And oh look, uh, that d- ceases to be an issue.

You know what why don't we c- just cut it off from the jump. It's not supposed to b-. And then somebody was like, We need a real reason for this because people don't understand. Just tell them God said to do it and they won't v- we'll stop getting so much pushback."

Jessica Wynn: I think that's probably so close. It just, it's so hard to wrap my mind around that somebody wouldn't be like, Or we could wash more thoroughly.

But I mean, one of the m- more harmful myths of FGM is the medicalization of it, and that's accelerating. So earlier I mentioned this is usually done by traditional practitioners, but one of the biggest changes in recent years is that FGM has become increasingly medicalized.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, [00:33:00] that sounds insane to me, but is not super shocking, I guess.

Jessica Wynn: I mean, today about a quarter of all girls who have recently undergone FGM were cut by healthcare workers, and in Egypt it's as high as like 75%.

Jordan Harbinger: And when you say in Egypt 75%, y- d- does this mean they were being cut by doctors now or what's going on here?

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, doctors, nurses, other licensed healthcare providers.

I mean, this is a really new trend.

Jordan Harbinger: I see. I guess I would've assumed medicine would've killed this practice and not adopted it.

Jessica Wynn: Well, that's what makes the trend so disturbing, right? I mean, the logic is if it's going to happen anyway, better that it happened in a clean clinic than on a dirt floor.

Jordan Harbinger: I can almost see how somebody talks themselves into medicalizing it, right?

It sounds compassionate on the surface, but let's say you're the healthcare worker or community member who performs FGM and come to understand the practice is wrong. But then you know if you refuse, the family's going to walk down the road to somebody with a rusty pair of pliers and a razor blade. [00:34:00] Oh my God.

Is there a clinic where they could just kind of fake it? I don't know. I'm f- thinking out loud here.

Jessica Wynn: You know, yeah. Actually, they... That happens. It happens very quietly, very secretly. Soy. Sore are documented cases of midwives and healthcare providers performing a symbolic ritual, what's called mock FGM, or I've seen it called whisper of the blade.

Jordan Harbinger: Okay.

Jessica Wynn: Which means no cutting at all. So they bring a girl into the room, they close the door, they let everyone outside believe the ritual is happening, but they never make a cut.

Jordan Harbinger: So they convince the family the procedure happened when it actually didn't.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, correct. So the girl comes back out with, you know, a bandage or whatever.

Jordan Harbinger: Oof.

Jessica Wynn: Everyone believes the obligation's been fulfilled, but the provider has secretly spared the child. And in communities where FGM is normalized, it's an incredibly controversial form of harm reduction.

Jordan Harbinger: Sure.

Jessica Wynn: So I [00:35:00] read some accounts that in communities where the secret gets out, it's, you know, bad news for the provider, but it's also secretive.

I haven't been able to verify specific cases. Plus, if you're not doing the cut to a five-year-old, they don't know the difference, so unless you're being inspected by your parents after, nobody's the wiser.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, you think that would happen. Like, "Let's see how this is healing. Oh, perfectly intact." I mean, how do they not figure that out right away?

Jessica Wynn: I mean, maybe they're relieved. Maybe they're in on it. It's really hard- I see ... to get the information clearly. But UNICEF has interviewed several anonymous midwives who admitted they felt conflicted about lying to the families, but believed refusing outright would just simply send the family somewhere more dangerous.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, that's an, just an impossible position to be in.

Jessica Wynn: I mean, it really is, and it's why organizations like the WHO and UNICEF ultimately [00:36:00] oppose even symbolic procedures. Sos. Soir concern is that if healthcare workers participate in any version of FGM, even one that causes no physical injury, it risks reinforcing the idea that the practice itself is acceptable.

So everyone agrees the child should be protected. The disagreement is whether harm reduction today delays ending the practice tomorrow.

Jordan Harbinger: That's one of those ethical problems where I can see why good people end up on different sides of the issue.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, sure. But it's completely categorically wrong to cut a girl.

You know, there's just no safe form of genital mutilation. Medicalization doesn't eliminate the harm. So the goal can't just be to prevent the next injury. It has to be ending the practice altogether. So arguably, it makes it more harmful because it's a veil of legitimacy. But the WHO's position is that it actually legitimizes the practice instead [00:37:00] of ending it.

So even though we think it's compassionate, it's not the best solution. You know, there was a 12-year-old girl named Nada Hassan Abdel Maqsoud. She bled to death at a private clinic in the town of Manfalout in Egypt. So it's awful, and it's... It would have been better if it was a mock FGM, but. That still happens because the practice is still done.

You know, her family took her there for the procedure thinking they were doing the right thing by d- getting it done by a medical professional, and she still died. So there's just no clinical context in which cutting healthy genital tissue from a non-consenting child is medicine. \

Jordan Harbinger: nIsn't there professional accountability when a doctor does this?

I feel like in most places, I should say most civilized places, and that answers the question I'm about to ask, I guess. But you can't just do your own pseudo-medical procedures and be like, "Well, that's how we do things around here," where I pretend that [00:38:00] what I do is medicine even if it's not. Like, th- doctors who do this lose their license in the United States.

They j- they can't just make up a procedure.

Jessica Wynn: Unfortunately, accountability is almost nonexistent. So in most countries where medicalization is common, doctors face little or n- no professional discipline. Medical schools should train students explicitly that this isn't medicine, but I couldn't find any medical school that covers FGM even a little bit.

So you're not reducing harm by performing it, and participation in this practice should and must be grounds for losing your license. And that institutional failure is a serious accountability gap.

Jordan Harbinger: Do the doctors who are doing this often genuinely believe they're helping, or are they just doing it for the money?

I

Jessica Wynn: mean, both probably exist, right? So we know from interviews and the

WHO that many healthcare providers genuinely believe they're reducing [00:39:00] harm. Others are responding to patient demand or community pressure, and yeah, sometimes financial incentives. So human motivation in general, it's just messier than simply one explanation.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. That's honestly scarier somehow.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I think so too.

But you know because if people are doing something horrific while believing they're helping, simply telling them they're evil, it's not going to change their behavior. The WHO addresses this directly and they actually created an International Day of Zero Tolerance for FGM. Medical practitioners carrying out FGM, you know they're only causing harm full stop but it's practiced surprisingly in the UK, in Europe and in the United States.

So assuming modernization fixes it is dangerous because it makes everyone think someone else will solve it.

Jordan Harbinger: Are there any hopeful signs in the younger generation though? I

Jessica Wynn: mean there is good news sure. Young people are [00:40:00] significantly less supportive of FGM than their parents and grandparents. The problem is like we mentioned before, the population growth is happening faster than attitudes are changing.

So researchers estimate that the number of girls who are expected to undergo FGM each year will rise to about 4.6 million by 2030 even though there's efforts to eliminate it. And not because support for FGM is growing, but because there are simply more girls being born in the regions where the practice is most common.

That's why changing minds matters, but you know it just isn't enough on its own.

Jordan Harbinger: Apparently tradition is the preferred euphemism when felony committed by grandma sounds too judgemental. We'll be right back.

This episode is sponsored in part by ConciergeMD. I've tried plenty of telehealth and concierge services over the years, and a lot of them sound great until you actually need something. Then you're waiting on shipping, you're chasing them down or you're sitting through [00:41:00] rushed appointments where nobody really explains anything.

That has not been my experience with ConciergeMD at all. What stands out most is how responsive they are. Orders get sent to the pharmacy quickly, and in my experience medications have shipped the next day or shortly thereafter. But it's not just speed; It's about communication. They take the time to explain what I'm taking, how it works, why it matters.

They don't talk down to me and they're not trying to rush me off the phone after a few minutes. That is surprisingly rare. And for me health and performance aren't one size fits all. I want a physician-led team that looks at the bigger picture energy sleep recovery hormones longevity travel lifestyle and helps me understand what is actually going on.

They even helped with documentation that I needed for a trip to China and sent a travel thermos fridge thing to help keep medication cold during the flight small detail but it showed that they really were paying attention. Concierge MD Works around your schedule and keeps everything connected Under One Roof go to conciergemd.com/Jordan and use code JORDAN. This episode is sponsored in part by Progressive. Do you ever think about switching insurance companies just to see if you could save some cash progressive makes it easy [00:42:00] just drop in some details about yourself and see if you're eligible to save money when you bundle your home and auto policies. The process only takes minutes and it could mean hundreds more in your pocket visit progressive.com after this episode to see if you could save. Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and Affiliates potential savings will vary. Not available in all states. Come join us on our subreddit, the r/JordanHarbinger subreddit. You can discuss the show. Get some dank memes and /or interact with other show fans. That’s over on the Jordan Harbinger Subreddit. And now back to Skeptical Sunday. So what keeps this going?

Because at this point, this feels less like ignorance. It's obviously not as simple as, well, people just don't know any better, right? If they're going to a hospital where a healthcare worker is doing it, I mean, they... Oh yeah, some people die while doing this, and there's no medical- Like, they have to know that.

Jessica Wynn: It isn't one thing that makes it keep going. It's, like, five or six things stacked on top of each other. You know, it's marriage. It's about sexuality, family honor. In some places, it's tied to [00:43:00] inheritance rights because being cut is a prerequisite for a girl's right to inherit property. You know, it's an economic livelihood for a lot of practitioners who are often women who depend on it for income.

But underneath all of it is the same fear that a girl who isn't cut may be considered unmarriageable, ostracized, or worse.

Jordan Harbinger: What's happening to boys in these same communities at the same time?

Jessica Wynn: This is actually crucial. So in many of the communities where FGM is most prevalent, boys are also undergoing severe initiation rites involving their own bodies, often around the same ages.

Jordan Harbinger: When you say initiation rites, what are we talking about? You know those, those things you see on Discovery Channel where they make a glove and they fill it with bullet ants or something like that- Yeah ... or they bungee jump with a vine into some dirt. I mean, that kind of stuff?

Jessica Wynn: It depends. There's so many different things, and in some communities, you know, boys are taken away from their families for [00:44:00] days or weeks as part of a broader initiation rite, and the circumcision is only one piece of it.

So they undergo circumcision, usually without anesthesia, sometimes in groups, and they're expected to endure the pain without showing fear, you know, to be a man. The ordeal is often tied to learning cultural traditions. They're expected to prove their toughness, and they're formally welcomed into adulthood.

It's about courage, masculinity, and just becoming an adult. But. Infections, injuries, and even deaths are documented in some of these ceremonies. \

Jordan Harbinger: nSo this isn't a doctor in a hospital with a newborn?

Jessica Wynn: No, not in these communities. It's a cultural rite of passage that usually happens, you know, at 12 or 13. So they're- they're older.

They are fully aware of what's happening. And the point here isn't that boys and girls experience the same thing, because they don't. FGM causes dramatically greater lifelong harm. The point [00:45:00] is that these societies often see physical suffering as the gateway to adulthood for both sexes. Now, this doesn't justify FGM or circumcision, but it changes the story to something more complicated than just men oppressing women, you know?

Jordan Harbinger: So who's usually driving this? Is it the fathers?

Jessica Wynn: Surprisingly, no. It's mostly women.

Jordan Harbinger: Huh.

Jessica Wynn: So the decision is overwhelmingly made by women, mothers, grandmothers, aunts. The older women in a girl's life are often the ones who insist it happens. The men pretty much stay silent, and the women often perform it as well.

Jordan Harbinger: That's really the last answer I expected. But at the same time, if families believe a girl won't get married unless she's cut, men are still part of the equation first. Sort of, I guess demanding that or, or allowing people to think that they're demanding that?

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean, that's an important distinction.

So in many communities the [00:46:00] immediate decision is often made by older women in a girl's life, but they're making that decision inside a system that's shaped by expectations about marriage, about status, and what they believe men want. So it's not as simple as saying women do this or men do this. The system depends on both.

And although women often make the decisions, you know, they're not creating the whole system.

Jordan Harbinger: I see. Well, that's not where most peoples heads go I think.

Jessica Wynn: I mean, not at all. It's because it's so hard to wrap our heads around this, right? Most people imagine this as men forcing women to do something. The reality, it's much more complicated.

The system is maintained by women who genuinely believe that they're protecting their daughter's future in a society where marriage status and security are all tied to whether or not she's been cut.

Jordan Harbinger: It seems more logical that if you underwent FGM as an adult woman you would spare the younger generation of the [00:47:00] same horrific ordeal.

Jessica Wynn: Well sure, but think about from the perspective of a mother in a community where FGM is universal. If her daughter isn't cut, she may never marry. No marriage means no economic security, no social standing, maybe no future at all. So from inside that worldview, FGM doesn't feel cruel, it feels like you're protecting your daughter.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. I mean, that's incredibly depressing though.

Jessica Wynn: This is all pretty depressing. It

Jordan Harbinger: is, yeah. That's true.

Jessica Wynn: You know, she's trying to protect her daughter with the very thing that's hurting her which is heartbreaking. And that's precisely why the interventions that work are the ones that change the social calculation, not just the legal status.

Laws matter, but if the social incentives stay the same, people just take the practice underground. And the communities that have made the biggest progress changed the incentives, not just the laws. And that's a much more challenging [00:48:00] project. But it's the one that actually delivers change, right? And it requires working with women not just talking about them.

Jordan Harbinger: Let's return to child marriage here because I think the connection is deeper than just it sometimes happens in places where FGM exists.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean, think of FGM and child marriage as like two gears in the same machine. One prepares the girl; the other completes the transaction.

Jordan Harbinger: So is that the same logic behind male circumcision too?

Jessica Wynn: To some degree in some societies but the degree of harm li- is categorically different. So FGM particularly types II and III they involve the removal of functional pleasure producing tissue in ways that cause lifelong pain permanently impair sexual function and create serious complications in childbirth and just beyond.

The medical evidence on male circumcision, that's genuinely mixed. There are some studies suggesting [00:49:00] marginal protective effects against certain infections in certain contexts. I personally think that's all very questionable. But in twenty twenty six in a Western society those reasons they become less and less convincing. The long-term harm profile for most men who undergo routine circumcision, it's considerably less severe than FGM though, but it's not nothing. \

Jordan Harbinger: nSo we're butchering boys for all the wrong reasons as well.

Jessica Wynn: I think so, and a big similarity between what girls and boys go through is consent or lack of consent. So neither the infant boy nor the infant girl asked for this. Both are having irreversible procedures performed on healthy genital tissue based on their parents' cultural preferences, religious beliefs, or just aesthetic choices.

Neither boys or girls have any capacity to meaningfully participate in the decision about their own body. The question isn't whether male circumcision [00:50:00] is as harmful as FGM. It almost certainly isn't. The question is do we believe people have the right to decide what happens to their own bodies? And if so, you know, at what age does that right begin?

And is our answer to those questions consistent, or does it depend on whose culture and whose religion we happen to be evaluating? I mean, imagine taking your kid... Like, I love tattoos. I'm not going to take a three-year-old to go get tattooed, you know? Yeah. It's just crazy.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, I'm not going to pretend I have a simple solution to all that.

I, th- the idea of a three-year-old getting a tat is kind of funny. I, I think about that sometimes too. Like, I'm like, "Oh man, I wish I had gotten a bunch of tattoos when I was younger, and I could have enjoyed them," and like, you know, really, I really like them. And then it's, I was thinking like, "Hey why don't I take Jayden.

We'll go get some matching tats." Why not, at age six.

Jessica Wynn: Right, and then when he becomes an adult, he's like, "That's super up."

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah bro, what was that all about? You got me a tribal band, you loser. Like, how cliche is this dad? Come on. [00:51:00]

Jessica Wynn: And I bet you would be immediately prosecuted.

Jordan Harbinger: Oh, I would hope so. I would hope so.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean, I think the honest answer here is that understanding something isn't the same as excusing it. So if you don't understand why people keep doing it, you're probably not going to stop it.

Jordan Harbinger: So within the anti-FGM movement, who's trying to change these practices?

Jessica Wynn: Most powerfully it's being done by African feminist scholars and activists, and that's exactly who should be leading it.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, that definitely makes sense to me.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean, the international response to FGM has been shaped primarily by Western governments and Western headquartered UN bodies. The funding flows through Western institutions. The frameworks for defining harm, measuring progress, and designing interventions are largely set in Geneva, New York, and London. The problem is the people best positioned to end FGM often [00:52:00] get the least funding while these large international organizations get most of the money. \

Jordan Harbinger: nOf course, the money doesn't always go where the expertise actually is.

Jessica Wynn: I know, right? And there's a long history of large amounts of money going to large international organizations and then, you know, a trickle reaching the grassroots groups that are actually doing the work. But survivor-led organizations, community-based activists, local women's movements, these groups unfortunately they're chronically underfunded while these institutional machinery around them is very well resourced. And some anti-FGM campaigns have consciously or not portrayed African cultures as, you know, savage and in need of civilizing from the outside.

That framing is not just offensive, it's totally counterproductive because it triggers entirely rational resistance from communities that have experienced colonialism and know exactly what that [00:53:00] civilizing rhetoric sounds like.

Jordan Harbinger: So the answer isn't to stop the campaigns, it's to run them differently.

Jessica Wynn: Absolutely. The answer is to fund local women's organizations, to let these communities lead, to listen to African feminists and survivor advocates who are fighting this battle from the inside. So many have lived with the consequences of FGM themselves, or they've spent their lives working in the communities where it persists.

And that kind of lived experience and local credibility is something no international organization can just, you know, parachute in. So the goal is the same ending FGM. The question is who's leading the effort? And the evidence is very clear that community led locally owned campaigns are the ones that actually produce durable change.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. I mean, it's very easy to list medical complications and have them land as abstract data points rather than affecting real women's lives. But I'm curious, what are the consequences [00:54:00] for FGM survivors? I mean, what is it like to have this done to you? What are you dealing with?

Jessica Wynn: God, I can't... It's so hard to think about but- I

Jordan Harbinger: know

Jessica Wynn: I think the most difficult part about survivors is that not all FGM survivors identify as victims, and not all of them want it to end. That's what happens in your world and you know no different. I mean there are women who have undergone FGM including the type three infibulation w-- that most severe form who will describe the experience as meaningful identity affirming and culturally central to who they are.

So they express pride in having undergone it and they want their daughters to undergo it. That can't be dismissed.

Jordan Harbinger: How do you contend with that without using it as a justification for the practice?

Jessica Wynn: Very carefully I guess.. I think the first thing to recognize is that the capacity to internalize and find meaning in something that was done to you without your [00:55:00] consent is one of the most profound things human beings do.

We are meaning making creatures. You know people find pride identity and community in all kinds of experiences that outsiders might categorize as harmful. That is real and it deserves respect. You know the second thing to recognize is that this doesn't resolve the question of harm or consent. The fact that some survivors don't identify as victims, it doesn't mean the harm isn't real.

I mean, we've established. The health consequences are documented. They're objective. And so it doesn't really matter about the survivor's subjective experience of them.

Jordan Harbinger: But the existence of these voices matters for how we approach the campaign to end it, right?

Jessica Wynn: Oh, enormously. If the anti-FGM movement is perceived as saying to women who support the practice, "You're a victim who doesn't know you're a victim," that's going to fail.

I mean, that framing is both, it's condescending and it's ineffective. [00:56:00] It's condescending because it denies women the complexity of their own experience. But it's ineffective because you can't build community consensus by telling half the community their perspective doesn't count. So the goal is to create conditions in which communities choose to stop, not to lecture survivors about what their lives mean.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, you gave an overview earlier, but let's... I want to slow down and walk through what actually happens to the body, because unfortunately, I don't think people really appreciate how severe this is, and the only way to do it is to get kind of gross and graphic with it, I think.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean. It is horrific. So in the immediate aftermath of FGM, and doesn't matter which type, there is severe bleeding, sometimes fatal.

There' नियुक्त a very high rate of infection, intense pain. It makes urinating problematic, and there's shock. I mean, your body's been through something [00:57:00] traumatic- Right ... and it goes into shock and girls die from this.

Jordan Harbinger: Geez.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean, that's just the beginning so chronic pain is ongoing daily for the rest of a woman's life.

Cysts are very common in women who've undergone FGM. There's abnormal scarring and keloid formation. Menstrual problems occur because, you know, the outflow of blood can be obstructed if you're narrowing the vagina. It's really dangerous.

Jordan Harbinger: And this is forever.

Jessica Wynn: Oh, for many women, yes. And then it causes sexual problems, like you just don't get joy out of sex.

I guess that's the point for a lot of people. There's a lot of pain during intercourse, significantly decreased sexual satisfaction. There's loss of a lot of function, and infertility is actually quite common. And then childbirth complications, that can just be catastrophic, particularly for women who have undergone [00:58:00] Type III.

So the narrowed vaginal opening that infibulation creates, you can imagine that makes labor extraordinarily dangerous.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, I think I brought that up before because it's like you're not, that's n- already not wide enough. There's a whole process we go through to make sure that the baby can come out and it still, you know, doesn't exactly slide right out.

I've seen two births. It's, uh, you still got to push pretty hard. So if that has been narrowed manually for no good reason really, that's not going to be good at all.

Jessica Wynn: Oh, right. I mean, it's just going to cause obstructed labor and- Yeah, oof ... in these communities w- women are expected to have many children, so it's, it's, it's so problematic.

Many will suffer from postpartum hemorrhage because the body's just not working like it should be, and this makes stillbirths and newborn death rates higher in places where FGM is practiced. Some of these complications are fatal to the woman herself obviously.

Jordan Harbinger: [00:59:00] What happens after childbirth?

Jessica Wynn: So this is pretty brutal.

Um- Par for

Jordan Harbinger: the course.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. But okay, so you've had FGM. Now you've had a baby which opens you back up in a way, but then they will perform what's called re-infibulation. So after a woman who has undergone Type III infibulation gives birth, a birth that's already traumatic and dangerous, she may be re-infibulated meaning her wound is sewn back up. And because the social and cultural logic that demanded the original closing of her body demands it again after it has been opened causes even more problems.

So one of the most important things to understand about FGM is that for women with type three, the harm's not just this one single event that happened in childhood. It's a recurring one redone at some of the most [01:00:00] vulnerable moments of their lives.

Jordan Harbinger: That is somehow so much worse than just thinking of it as a- an irreversible procedure, because I can...

Oh gosh, I just can't even imagine this. This must cause psychological distress for these women as well. I mean, imagine you give the traumatic birth and they're like, "Yeah, okay. We're not just going to help you heal. We're going to do that horrific operation again where we close you back up." I mean, that's just-

Jessica Wynn: Yeah, absolutely.

Women suffer from PTSD.

Jordan Harbinger: Sure.

Jessica Wynn: They have a lot of depression, anxiety. The postpartum depression rates are really high. One thing that really struck me is how many survivors talk about losing trust in the people who are supposed to protect them. Because the people arranging these procedures, they're often their own mothers and aunts and, you know, people they're closest with.

So it can affect a woman's ability to form trusting relationships for the rest of her life. And the physical and psychological consequences of FGM, they're not separate categories. You know, they [01:01:00] go hand-in-hand. A woman in chronic pain is more likely to withdraw from work and social life. That deepens isolation which worsens mental health.

It's just this system of harm. It's not like a list of independent symptoms.

Jordan Harbinger: Thank you for listening too and supporting the show. The funding goal is billions. The actual funding though is pocket lint and a panel discussion. Speaking of funding, I should probably get on that myself. We'll be right back. All of the advertisers are searchable and clickable on the deals page at jordanharbinger.com/deals.

Please consider supporting those who support the show. Now for the rest of Skeptical Sunday. Do survivors who do see themselves as victims, do they ever seek medical help outside of their communities? Because it seems like if you had this done, let's say, and you're living in the UK, you could go to a real doctor r- or something, right?

Jessica Wynn: Oh, yeah. I mean, they do, and it's often thought of [01:02:00] by these doctors as some kind of, like, second wound. You know, healthcare providers in the United States, the UK, Australia, Canada, they receive no training in FGM. Like I said before, it is... I can't find it in any, i- mentioned in any medical school. So they may not even recognize what they're looking at anatomically.

They could misdiagnose symptoms. They may ask inappropriate or re-traumatizing questions. And some survivors have reported they have to explain to their own doctors what FGM is, what's been done to their bodies, and what the clinical implications are. So think about what that asks of a person, to be the expert witness on your own trauma in the moment when you're seeking care.

Jordan Harbinger: So is culturally competent FGM care available anywhere? Because if it's not available in the West, wh- where can you go for help?

Jessica Wynn: In very small pockets. The UK has developed [01:03:00] more specialist capacity than most countries largely because it has a sizable Somali and Sudanese community. Both Somalia and Sudan have historically had some of the highest rates of FGM in the world.

So British healthcare providers have spent decades building specialist clinics, training midwives and nurses, and learning how to care for women who have survived FGM. Even so, those services are unevenly distributed, they're chronically underfunded, and they exist nowhere near the scale that's needed. In the United States, even more fragmented.

And this connects directly to the funding gap because the money to train healthcare providers, to build specialist services, to support survivor-led mental health programs, it just simply isn't there at the scale required.

Jordan Harbinger: I see. So is there hope? I mean, not just what's being done, but what's actually working, because it's, it just sounds awful that people have to live [01:04:00] with this.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean, there are concrete models of success. So Cameroon, Ghana, and Uganda have already achieved their FGM elimination targets ahead of the 2030 deadline. Benin, the Maldives, Niger, and Togo, they're all on track to achieve zero cases by the end of the decade. I mean, these are actual results, and the pattern that emerges from every place that has succeeded is consistent.

Change happens from the inside out. Not the outside in. \

Jordan Harbinger: nYeah. Well, some of these places are, are authoritarian, right? So I, I would imagine in a place like Cameroon, the dictator just says, "Hey, don't do this anymore or we'll throw your whole family in a gulag forever and kill you." And that will get to that 2030 deadline at ahead of time I suppose.

Yeah. Wow.

Jessica Wynn: But they probably have high rates of back alley FGM, you know?

Jordan Harbinger: Sure. I was going to say the... yeah, these are- they just-- or they said, "Okay, don't [01:05:00] report these anymore so that it looks like we hit our goal." If you've ever met anyone from Cameroon, they're always like, "Oh no," it's like a Cr- It's like North Korea, but it's in Africa.

It's probably a really interesting place to visit actually.

Jessica Wynn: Tell me about it. I, I will not join you .

Jordan Harbinger: No. Yeah, yeah, yeah. I'll, uh, send you a postcard. What, what is... You said d- it happens from the inside out, not the outside in. What does inside out look like in practice though?

Jessica Wynn: The gold standard is Tostan which is a West African NGO whose community empowerment program has helped nearly 9,000 communities completely abandon FGM.

Wow. That's remarkable.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah.

Jessica Wynn: And their approach is not to arrive and announce that FGM is wrong and demand change. They facilitate conversations about health, human rights and what families actually want for their daughters. So this encourages communities to reach their own conclusions, and when the decision comes from inside the community, it's much more likely to last.

You know, when [01:06:00] elders and mothers and religious leaders collectively decide this is not who we are anymore, that change is durable and it holds because, you know, it belongs to them.

Jordan Harbinger: Does this kind of change take generations because it seems like it's going to take generations.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean sometimes sure, but not always.

Uh, Somaliland is an extraordinary example. So through the UN Trust Fund to End Violence against Women grassroots organizations in Somaliland led a program of education, dialogue and community engagement. And within the last 30 years parental support for ending infibulation surged nearly 100%. And the number of religious leaders who recognized infibulations harmful effects went from 52% to 96%.

No, those are near total community transformations. And they happen through patient respectful locally led conversation, not [01:07:00] legislation, not external pressure, just real conversation which as we're finding out is really hard to have. And in 2018 they banned infibulation. Unfortunately the other types are still practiced, but you know progress is progress.

Jordan Harbinger: Oh man. You said no major religion actually requires FGM. So why are religious leaders important in ending it? Because it seems like they're not the authority on this.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. Well although FGM isn't required by scripture there are communities where it's justified using religious or traditional arguments. But there's a small village in Mali called Tongo, and when their very respected, powerful religious leaders changed their position and publicly declared an end to FGM, the social permission structure changed with them. So these religious leaders have influence that no external organization can replicate.

So working [01:08:00] with them, equipping them with accurate information about what FGM is and that it's not required by their faith and what the health consequences are, that's not just useful, that's often the determinative factor. You know, I mean, think of it, a community that just does everything their religious leader says, that's a powerful place for them.

Jordan Harbinger: That's true. It's ironic that it seems to be men declaring this. So it seems that the narrative around men and FGM is more complicated than men are the problem or m- you know, men bad.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I really don't find that to be the, the case. I, I honestly don't think a lot of men, first of all, understand the anatomy, and really don't understand what's happening.

And it's... yeah, it's just way more complicated. So one of the biggest misconceptions is that all the men in these communities support FGM. They don't. Surveys from practicing countries in Africa and the Middle East suggest that roughly, you know, 200 million boys and men, they want the practice to end. And in many [01:09:00] communities, parents with young daughters, they don't want it to continue.

Jordan Harbinger: So why doesn't it stop? Nobody wants this, so wh- why is it still happening?

Jessica Wynn: Because people aren't just responding to what they personally believe, they're responding to what they think everyone else believes. You know, one of the strongest drivers of FGM is the assumption that men will only marry girls who've been cut, that a girl who is not cut will not find a husband.

So when men in a community publicly and visibly say, "I will marry an uncut woman," they're directly dismantling the social myth that makes FGM feel like a necessary protection for girls' futures. That can change everything.

Jordan Harbinger: So the fathers and brothers need to speak up. But do they? Wou- would they face consequences socially for speaking out about this kind of thing?

Jessica Wynn: know, we're, we have to take ourselves out of our lifestyle and think how difficult that probably is for them to speak up. [01:10:00] But in many households, fathers and brothers are aware that FGM is happening to their daughters and sisters, but they stay silent. Sometimes out of deference to the women in the family who are driving the decision, sometimes because speaking up feels like a violation of the gender norms that define their role.

You know, the moral weight of that silence and what it costs men psychologically to carry it, that's real. And the path to male allyship runs through creating space for those men to break that silence, to name what they know is wrong, to say, "Not my daughter." So men who speak up aren't just protecting individual girls, they're like fracturing the consensus that the practice depends on.

But the legal picture here, you know, that's mixed.

Jordan Harbinger: So what is the legal landscape? Is there legislation for, aga- and against FGM?

Jessica Wynn: I mean, it really depends on where you are. Egypt has made FGM a [01:11:00] federal crime punishable by up to 15 years in prison, though enforcement, you know, remains kind of uneven. In 2024, the European Parliament adopted a new directive requiring all EU member states to criminalize FGM, increase public awareness, and provide support to survivors.

That means 27 countries. That's huge. In the United States, of course, the situation's more complicated. So a federal law banning FGM was effectively struck down- Oh, man ... in 2018 when a federal judge in Michigan ruled that criminal law on this issue should be left to individual states. He was ruling on a specific case involving this Detroit doctor who was accused of mutilating the genitals of multiple girls.

Jordan Harbinger: I'm not super surprised this happened in the United States, but it is shocking how many holes are in the law about this.

Jessica Wynn: I mean, it shocked a lot of people- Yeah ... . Because [01:12:00] it just shattered the assumption that this was only happening overseas. And there was no federal law here to enforce it, so it shaped the legal landscape with the result that some states have explicit bans, others don't.

Advocates w- are working state by state to close those gaps. I mean, it is crazy that we don't have a federal law banning this.

Jordan Harbinger: I agree. I think it's crazy that this is not banned in the United States. It's makes no sense to me. And legislation without enforcement in places does absolutely nothing. Like, I get, I kind of get the argument that it should be left to the states, but, uh, that seems more like a legal technicality to me.

Like, the judge said, "Huh? Okay, you know, this is going to cause a bunch of problems." But yeah, it should've been fairly easy for somebody to propose a federal ban on this I don't know. Come on, man.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. It's just wild. So-

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah ...

Jessica Wynn: they just criminalize a practice, but they're not protecting anyone. You know, laws without political will and social support behind them, they [01:13:00] tend to push these kinds of practices underground rather than end them.

And the legal framework, it's necessary, but it's just not sufficient. So it has to be accompanied by training for healthcare workers and even teachers who can identify at-risk girls. You know, there needs to be support for survivors who come forward. And crucially, for diaspora communities in Western countries, immigration and asylum protections need to be happening for girls at risk.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, that's a pathway I hadn't considered, and it's something the US or the UK could actually act on. Like, hey, if your parents are trying to take you, trick you into a basement to get your parts cut, you can apply for asylum because they're basically going to torture you. I mean, this, that whole thing is just totally psycho to me.

Jessica Wynn: Some girls have successfully fled FGM through asylum claims. I mean, I guess they were lucky that it didn't happen when they were a baby, and they had the autonomy to leave. But. The argument is that they face a well-founded fear of [01:14:00] persecution and that their home country is unable or unwilling to protect them.

So courts in the US, UK, Canada, and Australia, they have all granted asylum on these grounds. There are NGOs that specifically work on FGM asylum cases and help girls and families navigate the legal process. And these organizations, they're underfunded, but they are doing life-saving work. So supporting FGM asylum legal aid organizations, that's one of the most concrete things someone can do to help.

Jordan Harbinger: So what is happening with young people? Does social media, I wonder, have campaigns against FGM that affect the younger generation? Because it seems like the more people get connected to the internet, the more they're like, "Uh, yeah, this is some barbaric ish that we're not doing anymore."

Jessica Wynn: I actually, once I started doing the research, was amazed and sort of pleased by how many, like reels and, and posts started popping up that were against this.

So data shows that 15 to 19-year-olds in [01:15:00] affected countries are way less supportive of FGM than older generations. But we don't really know how that shift is happening, if it's social media or other things. I think, you know, social media is definitely swaying opinion. There's youth activists in Nigeria, Kenya, and Egypt, and they're using TikTok and Instagram and YouTube, you know, to talk about FGM in ways that would've just been unthinkable a generation ago.

So they're sharing their stories, they're debunking myths in local languages. They're organizing, they're building communities of solidarity for survivors and girls who are resisting. So this is young women and men in affected communities deciding on their own terms, in their own languages and cultural contexts, that this practice ends with them, and that's enormously powerful.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah, that's the inside out model you described as the one that actually works.

Jessica Wynn: Absolutely. And it's even better because it's the inside out model running at the speed [01:16:00] of the internet. You know, I think there is genuine reason to believe that this generation that grew up with smartphones and access to global conversations may be the one that tips it, not without all the other work, but they are a force that wasn't there 20 years ago, and it would be a mistake to underestimate them.

Jordan Harbinger: So all this requires resources. Where does the money for these anti-FGM campaigns, where's that coming from?

Jessica Wynn: So the funding picture is pretty alarming. I mean, by the end of this decade, an estimated $275 million will have been spent globally on addressing FGM. The amount that researchers estimate is needed to actually eliminate the practice by 2030 is $2.4 billion.

Jordan Harbinger: Okay, well that's a huge gap. Come on.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. And the funding that does exist has been declining, particularly for the survivor-led organizations and local women's movements that are doing the most effective [01:17:00] work. The gap just isn't closing.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. The funding gap's not just a number, it's a reflection of a set of political choices about whose safety is worth funding.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. And it has a human face. You know, it's the survivor sitting in a doctor's office who has to explain her own trauma. It's the FGM asylum case that doesn't get the legal representation it needs. It's the youth activist in Nairobi who's doing extraordinary work on a mobile phone with no organizational support.

So the money is the politics made concrete.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. Are there examples of what proper funding can actually do, or is this kind of a money pit?

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. No, I mean, there, there are legitimate organizations like Through The Spotlight Initiative. The UN worked with the National Traditional Council of Chiefs and Elders in Liberia to extend a national ban on FGM.

Three hundred traditional FGM practitioners were helped to transition to new livelihoods through [01:18:00] training for other occupations because y- for many of these women performing FGM, that's their income so th- they have no incentive to stop it, right? It's, it's how they feed their families. You can't remove a practice that someone depends on economically without offering an alternative.

And the Liberia model recognized this and addressed it directly. That's a model worth replicating.

Jordan Harbinger: FGM persists because it's surrounded by this silence, right? The silence is not accidental. It's structural. It's enforced in the, uh, the first condition. Well, it's really the first condition that has to change.

Jessica Wynn: Yeah. I mean, I think the silence exists too because it's hard to talk about , right? I mean, in communities where FGM has been normalized for generations some people don't really understand what FGM is, and they've just never talked about it. They've never questioned the practice. That moment of recognition when the silence breaks and someone who was inside it finally sees it's [01:19:00] not this small thing, that's how cultural change begins.

Uh, so it's one conversation at a time. It's one person saying "This happened to me and it was wrong and I'm not going to pretend it didn't."

Jordan Harbinger: The question about all this both male and female cutting is what is the principle by which we decide? Do we believe in bodily autonomy? Do we believe that children have the right to have their bodies respected until they can decide for themselves?

Because If we are serious about protecting children's bodies, the principle has to be a principle not like a preference that we apply selectively based on cultural proximity. I, I obviously I don't have a clean answer. I don't think anyone does, but I think these kinds of questions are worth sitting with. \

Jessica Wynn: nI would add that the people who are living with it most honestly are the survivors.

So we mentioned Jaha Dukureh cut at one week old. She spent her adult life asking the hardest version of this question from inside the community where it happened to her and where she's trying to make sure it [01:20:00] doesn't happen to anyone else. Mariam Safi lured into the basement in India at seven-years-old.

She stood up at the UN and said, "I don't fit the profile." Like, this is a bigger problem than you think meaning we can't be protecting a practice that's happening to girls who look like the people you think are safe. So these women refused the silence, and that refusal is, you know, the engine of everything.

Jordan Harbinger: Yeah. What can someone listening to this do practically right now? Because it's s-... Again, it still seems like it happens over there even though I know it's happened in the city where I grew up. I

Jessica Wynn: mean, there's several things. So you can support survivor led organizations. There's something called Safe Hands for Girls, Tostan.

There's The Desert Flower Foundation. There's Integrate UK. I mean, there are these grassroots organizations that are doing the most effective work with the least resources. If you're in the United [01:21:00] States, find out whether your state has an explicit FGM ban. I mean, do you know if California does? I don't.

I have no idea. Yeah. Yeah, exactly. You know many of us don't so contact your state legislators if you're in a state that it's legal in. And if you work in healthcare push for FGM training in your institution. It's not standard and it should be. If you encounter someone who might be at risk. Know that the National FGM Center and similar organizations. They can advise you how to respond safely. And if you're in a position to support asylum seekers. Know that FGM asylum cases are real and A viable pathway and that legal aid organizations working on them. Are chronically underfunded. And finally most basically and perhaps most powerfully have this conversation. Don't treat FGM as too disturbing to mention. You know every conversation [01:22:00] matters. \

Jordan Harbinger: nJess thank you. This has definitely been one of the hardest and most important conversations we've had on this show I it's hard because you want to like make jokes and make it light and keep people interested but- Yeah sorry everybody

It's really really hard to do on this one. Um. Thank you for not looking away and for cutting through the noise. Yeah I'll see myself out. We'll link to the organizations doing the work in the show notes. If this episode moved you please share it. That's how the silence breaks. And thank you all for sticking with us and listening. Topic suggestions for future episodes of Skeptical Sunday. To me Jordan@jordanharbinger.com. Advertisers deals discounts ways to support the show. All at jordanharbinger.com/deals I'm @JordanHarbinger on Twitter and Instagram. You can also connect with me on LinkedIn. You can find Jessica on her Substacks Between The Lines and Where Shadows Linger We'll link to those in the show notes. Her work is also on Instagram @NeverMetJessica plural. And this show was created in association with Podcast One. My team is Jen Harbinger, Jase Sanderson, Tadas Sidlauskas, Robert Fogerty, Ian Baird, Gabriel Mizrahi. [01:23:00] Our advice and opinions are our own. And I might be a lawyer but I'm not your lawyer; I'm no certainly not a doctor. And we of course try to get these as right as we can. Not everything is gospel even if it's fact checked. So consult a qualified professional before applying anything you hear on the show especially if it's about your health and wellbeing. Remember, we rise by lifting others. Share the show with those you love. If you found the episode useful, please share it with somebody else who could use a good dose of the skepticism and knowledge we doled out today. In the meantime I hope you apply what you hear on the show so you can live what you learn. And we'll see you next time.